USAID PREDICT - Part Six - Time For China Travel Ban?
Trump's Most Effective Measure Of First Time May Be Timely Again
If John Brennan and his CIA cronies are running their USAID PREDICT China partners into the United States to start another pandemic and Wall Street crash, why not stop it before it gets started?
Detailed Summary
The article warns that former CIA Director John Brennan and his “CIA cronies” may be leveraging USAID’s PREDICT partnerships in China to engineer a fresh pandemic—and accompanying Wall Street crash—into the United States. Drawing on ten days of metadata “spiking” toward a China-based epidemic vector, the author challenges political leaders, particularly former President Trump, to pre-emptively impose a China travel ban rather than be “suckered into a Cold War” by Brennan’s alleged machinations. The piece frames George Webb’s Task Force Orange Journal as the lone independent platform sounding the alarm and urging immediate action to forestall what it portrays as a repeat of 9/11-style intelligence deception.
John Brennan
John Brennan, former CIA Director (2013–2017), is cast here as the architect behind a covert biothreat campaign using USAID’s PREDICT program in China. The article accuses him of coordinating with Chinese partners to seed a new virus outbreak on U.S. soil, claiming that metadata “spikes” over ten days point squarely to his orchestration. It further alleges that Brennan manipulates other figures—such as convincing Kash Patel—to pin the scheme on China, thereby deflecting attention from his own role.
Brennan’s lengthy CIA career, which included steering counterterrorism and covert-action desks, lends plausibility in the author’s view to his purported capability for such an operation. By invoking the mythos of “9/11”—which the article also attributes to Brennan’s prior skullduggery—it suggests a pattern of intelligence-community deception on a national scale. Ultimately, the author demands a pre-emptive China travel ban to thwart Brennan’s “onslaught,” portraying him as an ongoing existential threat to U.S. security.
While Brennan’s public legacy centers on counterterrorism and Middle East policy, this narrative repurposes that history into a bio-security conspiracy. The charges rest on unverified metadata trends and political conjecture, reflecting deep mistrust of the intelligence establishment. Regardless, Brennan’s name functions here as shorthand for a clandestine cabal manipulating global health for geopolitical ends.
Kash Patel
Kash Patel, former Chief of Staff to then-Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, is depicted as a unwitting conduit in Brennan’s alleged plot. The article claims Brennan “convinced” Patel to frame the forthcoming epidemic as a purely Chinese initiative, thereby shielding CIA-linked U.S. actors from scrutiny. Patel’s prior involvement in Congressional intelligence oversight and his role in the Pentagon lend weight to his portrayal as both insider and dupe.
Patel served on the House Intelligence Committee under Rep. Devin Nunes, where he often pushed anti-China and anti-Russia narratives. His transition to the Defense Department in late 2020 placed him at the nexus of policy implementation during a volatile period. In this account, Patel’s proximity to power makes him an ideal fall guy—Brennan manipulates him to deflect blame onto China.
By alleging that Brennan used Patel’s platform to spread disinformation, the article underscores its broader theme of intelligence-community betrayal. Patel’s subsequent prominence among conservative media as a Trump loyalist intensifies the drama of his purported manipulation. Whether or not these claims hold water, Patel’s inclusion illustrates the author’s thesis that no high-level actor within U.S. national security can be trusted.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump, former President of the United States, is addressed as the key decision-maker who could halt Brennan’s scheme. The article urges him to enact a China travel ban immediately, arguing that “a slowdown in business with China” is a small price compared to another pandemic and financial collapse. It casts Trump’s prior trade-reconfiguration stance as proof that he already has the leverage to resist being “suckered into a Cold War” orchestrated by Brennan.
Throughout his presidency, Trump maintained a contentious relationship with both Chinese leadership and the U.S. intelligence community. His 2018–2019 tariffs and public disputes with intelligence agencies over Russia and China feed into the article’s depiction of him as uniquely positioned to counteract Brennan. The narrative suggests that Trump’s instinct for bold unilateral action is precisely what’s needed to pre-empt the alleged bio-attack.
By framing Trump’s choices in stark, existential terms, the article appeals to his penchant for high-stakes confrontation. It portrays the decision as a litmus test: either stand firm or risk playing into Brennan’s hands. Whether one agrees with the premise or not, Trump’s inclusion underscores the politicized nature of pandemic policy in this narrative.
George Webb
George Webb is the independent journalist and founder of Task Force Orange Journal, the platform hosting these warnings. He positions himself as the lone voice with “ten days of data points” charting a suspicious uptick in epidemiological metadata tied to China. Webb’s oeuvre frequently alleges clandestine CIA and State Department programs behind major global events, and here he reprises that role—summoning his readership to subscribe and spread the alarm.
Webb’s background spans investigative reporting on intelligence operations, biothreat research, and political scandals dating back to 2023. His claim to have briefed CNN—only to be “covered up” by Donie O’Sullivan—feeds into his broader narrative of mainstream-media collusion. By anchoring this piece in Task Force Orange Journal, Webb underscores his reliance on reader support rather than institutional backing.
Critics often regard Webb’s conspiratorial style as speculative, pointing to a lack of independently verifiable evidence. Nonetheless, his persistent refrain—that only rapid, pre-emptive action can stop “Brennan’s onslaught”—resonates with audiences predisposed to distrust official channels. Webb’s prominence in this article exemplifies the power of self-published journalism in shaping pandemic-origin discourse.
CIA
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is cast as the shadow engine driving the alleged covert pandemic plot. Referred to as “Brennan’s cronies,” the agency is accused of funneling USAID PREDICT funds through Chinese partners to engineer a new biothreat. The CIA’s storied history of clandestine operations—with episodes ranging from coups to false-flag events—provides the template for this narrative.
According to the article, the CIA leverages diplomatic and scientific cover—such as USAID programs—to mask its true objectives. This tactic mirrors documented instances where the Agency has collaborated with contractors and front organizations for intelligence-gathering. By implicating the CIA, the author taps into deep-seated anxieties about unchecked spy-agency power in public health.
While the CIA’s core mission remains foreign intelligence and covert action, its portrayal here as a pandemic provocateur underscores the article’s conspiratorial thrust. The charges rest on circumstantial “metadata” rather than smoking-gun documents, reflecting broader skepticism toward intelligence community transparency. Still, invoking the CIA amplifies the article’s call to arms against an invisible, high-tech adversary.
USAID PREDICT
USAID PREDICT is the flagship “emerging pandemic threats” program launched in 2009 with global field sites to detect novel viruses. The article alleges that its Chinese offshoots serve as a backdoor for CIA-guided bioweapon development, now poised to strike back on U.S. soil. By accusing PREDICT of dual-use research, the author contends that ostensibly humanitarian surveillance masks malicious intent.
Historically, PREDICT has catalogued thousands of animal pathogens, publishing open-access data with partner labs worldwide. Proponents argue this work bolsters pandemic preparedness by identifying threats early; critics counter that it risks spillovers and can be repurposed for gain-of-function studies. The article amplifies these concerns, claiming that metadata “surges” point to imminent weaponization.
Calling for an immediate shutdown, the author urges policymakers to defund PREDICT’s international networks. He frames the program as a trojan horse—scientific veneer over an intelligence-community operation—rather than a neutral public-health tool. In this light, PREDICT becomes emblematic of the blurred lines between aid, science, and espionage.
Task Force Orange Journal
Task Force Orange Journal is George Webb’s reader-supported Substack platform, devoted to unmasking alleged intelligence front programs. The article plugs the Journal as the only venue reliably exposing “Brennan’s onslaught,” soliciting free and paid subscriptions to sustain the research. It portrays mainstream outlets as compromised—while Task Force Orange alone maintains editorial independence.
Since its launch, the Journal has focused on CIA-linked biotech projects, bioweapons allegations, and high-stakes political intrigue. Webb’s model relies on direct audience funding rather than institutional grants, which he claims preserves his objectivity. The Journal’s unfiltered style and rapid-fire claims attract a niche following eager for alternative narratives.
Critics challenge the Journal’s evidentiary standards and accuse it of amplifying unverified rumors. Yet in an era of declining trust in legacy media, such platforms fill a demand for outsider perspectives. Task Force Orange thus exemplifies the rise of independent, subscription-driven news as both disruptor and provocateur in the information landscape.
Wall Street
“Wall Street” stands in the article as the domain poised to crash under the weight of a new pandemic—its financial markets depicted as a secondary victim of Brennan’s alleged biothreat. The author warns that stock indices and investment banks would suffer catastrophic losses, repeating the economic turmoil of 2020. By coupling a viral surge with financial collapse, the piece heightens the stakes for immediate preventive measures.
Historically, pandemics have triggered market sell-offs, liquidity crunches, and shifts in investor sentiment. The article leverages this precedent to argue that delaying action invites both a health and economic catastrophe. In doing so, it appeals not only to public-health concerns but also to fiscal self-interest among policymakers and the business community.
In portraying Wall Street as collateral damage, the author underscores the interconnectedness of global health and financial stability. The implied threat of broad market disruption bolsters the call for pre-emptive travel bans and program shutdowns. It frames the issue as one where the cost of inaction dwarfs any short-term diplomatic or trade considerations.
Or should we wait for the Brennan onslaught? We know the surge is coming. Why not stop it before it starts?
We have ten days of data points pointing to squarely toward a China epidemic being vectored on to the United States.
What does Trump have to lose? A slowdown in business with China? We are already in a trade reconfiguration stance with China. The key is not to be suckered into a Cold War with China by John Brennan.
All the metadata points to Brennan vectoring the attack on the US with his USAID PREDICT China hands and then convincing Kash Patel it was China’s idea.
Brennan has done it before - it was called 9/11. And he is doing it again. Shut Brennan’s China pandemic vectoring down now with a China travel ban.