Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vic Hughes's avatar

A friend had sent me a short clip (I didn't see the rest so my comments were based on that) of Soon talking to Carlson about cancers. There were several screaming red flags I noted to her.

1.) They said the cancers were caused by the spike protein in both the infected and the injected.

2.) They never discussed the relative ratios among the injected vs the infected leaving the impression it didn't matter, but it would have been really damning if it was primarily or exclusively Shot related.

3.) They never mentioned all the other known carcinogens in the Shots and their impact on cancers.

4.) They never mentioned even if the cancers were prevalent in the infected, the Shots increased your risk of getting infected, so the Shots were damned if their other carcinogens caused the cancers and they were damned if the infections caused the cancer because they increased your odds of infection. 5.) Finally Carlson did a throw away line about how many people globally got the Shots and said it was something like 1 billion. The Good Doctor had to know it was over 5 billion people and said nothing,

In Summary, everything the Good Doctor did protected the idea that maybe it was the Shots causing the cancers. Why? Because as aptly noted above, the Good Doctor is selling the next Shot.

Expand full comment
C Adams's avatar

Well wow-I fell for the TC interview and forwarded to my friends. I just forwarded your timely essay to my small group. Thank you for likely saving our lives as I’m certain RFK, Jr. might not have disapproved of said vax!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts