DARPA, NATO, WHO - Part Twelve - NATO Wants A Twenty Year War In Ukraine

Or Just More Rothschild Missile Teeter Totter?

When I visited the Ukrainian border in Poland in March 2022, and I watched the fleeing families during the outbreak of the Ukraine War, I was convinced that NATO wants another two-decade Iraq or Afghanistan War to claim Ukraine as its territory. WARNING - a central theme of my work is that NATO and the Atlantic Council want a twenty-year war in Ukraine, just like Iraq and Afghanistan, to test their viruses and vaccines.

Most Ukrainians don’t want the War. The folks in the Ukrainian-speaking part of Ukraine don’t care that some Ukrainians in the Donbass prefer to speak Russian. The families I saw fleeing Ukraine said they were never coming back. The people of Ukraine don’t want this War.

They don’t care if NATO wants to build a gas pipeline across Ukraine or to the Black Sea. I even tried to get political prisoner Gonzo Lira to get out while he could. Kolomoisky’s Azov Brigade murdered him as I told him they would.

Normal Ukrainians don’t care if part of their country speaks Russian. Only NATO gas pipeline builders do.

Detailed Summary:

The author reflects on his visits to the Ukraine-Poland border and France during the Ukraine War, expressing skepticism about NATO’s real intentions, suggesting they seek to exploit Ukraine much like Iraq or Afghanistan, primarily for gas pipelines and military sales. He recounts warning political prisoner Gonzalo Lira about the threat posed by Kolomoisky’s Azov Brigade, which he claims ultimately killed Lira.

The article discusses how France's deployment of 2,000 troops to Romania—confirmed by Russian sources—threatens to escalate the NATO-Russia proxy war into a direct, possibly nuclear, confrontation, a warning echoed by military analysts like Scott Ritter.

Ultimately, the author suggests the war is less about immediate victory and more about a controlled, incremental arms race driven by financial interests ("Rothschild Teeter Totter" concept), comparing today’s missile dynamics to the Cold War’s fabricated "missile gap" designed to enrich the military-industrial complex.

---

Person Descriptions :

1. Gonzalo Lira
Gonzalo Lira was a Chilean-American political commentator and filmmaker who lived in Ukraine and criticized both Ukrainian and Western narratives about the war. He was reportedly detained and later died in Ukraine under controversial circumstances. The author claims Lira was murdered by forces linked to Kolomoisky’s Azov Brigade, after he had warned him to flee. Lira’s death has been framed as part of broader efforts to silence dissenting voices during the conflict.

2. Ihor Kolomoisky
Ihor Kolomoisky is a powerful Ukrainian oligarch and former governor of Dnipropetrovsk, known for funding private militias like the Azov Battalion. He allegedly played a significant role in financing nationalist forces during the early phase of the Ukraine conflict. Kolomoisky has been accused of corruption both in Ukraine and internationally, including by U.S. authorities. In this article, he is portrayed as a key figure behind the Azov Brigade’s violent actions against dissidents like Gonzalo Lira.

3. Emmanuel Macron
Emmanuel Macron is the President of France who reportedly authorized sending 2,000 French soldiers to Romania, close to Ukraine, according to Russian claims. His decision to escalate military involvement is portrayed as risking a broader NATO-Russia war. Macron has positioned France as a major player in European security but has faced criticism for moves seen as provocative. The article views his action as a deliberate "French Escalation," heightening tensions toward a possible World War III.

4. Scott Ritter
Scott Ritter is a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq, known for exposing flaws in U.S. WMD claims before the Iraq War. He has warned that the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine could trigger an automatic escalation to nuclear conflict. Ritter recently appeared with Judge Andrew Napolitano to publicize these warnings. His expertise in weapons inspections lends credibility to his stark predictions about the risks of NATO’s actions.

5. Judge Andrew Napolitano
Judge Andrew Napolitano is a former New Jersey Superior Court judge and a media commentator, especially known for his libertarian views on constitutional rights. Recently, he has hosted discussions warning about the Ukraine escalation, including with figures like Scott Ritter. Napolitano emphasizes the dangers of military overreach and advocates for diplomatic solutions over warfare. His platform amplifies dissenting voices warning against nuclear escalation.

6. Robert Allen Hale
Robert Allen Hale, allegedly a son of FBI sniper IB Hale, was implicated in violent crimes including the shooting of the daughter of Texas Governor John Connolly. He is said to have participated in blackmail operations linked to compromising President John F. Kennedy. The article suggests Hale's connections tie back to major defense contractors and clandestine political operations. His family's background in the "sniper business" is linked metaphorically to the ruthless world of missile sales.

7. IB Hale
IB Hale was an FBI sniper who later became CEO of the major defense contractor Convair, known for building intercontinental ballistic missiles. He symbolizes the merging of government covert operations and corporate defense interests. His family is portrayed as deeply involved in the business of military technology and political manipulation. Hale’s career illustrates the interconnectedness of law enforcement, intelligence operations, and military industrial profits.

8. Ken Hale
Ken Hale is alleged to be a descendant of IB Hale and Robert Allen Hale, holding a top-secret U.S. State Department clearance. The author accuses him of making threats to “Waco” or “Jonestown” his family for exposing missile sales manipulations. Ken Hale’s background is presented as an extension of a long lineage of violent enforcement for the defense establishment. His threats illustrate the high stakes of whistleblowing in the defense industry.

9. Donie O’Sullivan
Donie O’Sullivan is a CNN reporter known for covering misinformation, disinformation, and online extremism. The author criticizes O’Sullivan for allegedly twisting death threat evidence into a false narrative against him. O’Sullivan is accused of protecting NATO interests by mischaracterizing whistleblowers. His reporting is portrayed as biased toward the establishment he ostensibly covers.

---

Organization Descriptions (Four Sentences Each):

1. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
NATO is a military alliance formed in 1949 between the United States, Canada, and European countries to provide collective security against the Soviet Union. In this article, NATO is portrayed as seeking to militarize Ukraine to advance gas pipeline interests and expand its influence. Its actions in Ukraine are framed as part of a broader pattern of creating "forever wars" similar to Iraq and Afghanistan. NATO’s invocation of Article Five is seen as a pathway to escalating regional conflicts into global wars.

2. Azov Brigade (Azov Battalion)
The Azov Brigade, initially a volunteer paramilitary militia, later incorporated into Ukraine’s National Guard, has been accused of nationalist extremism. Funded in part by figures like Ihor Kolomoisky, the unit gained notoriety during the conflict with Russia-backed forces in eastern Ukraine. The article claims the Azov Brigade murdered Gonzalo Lira to suppress dissent. Its role in the conflict is depicted as violently advancing oligarchic and NATO-aligned interests.

3. Russian Ministry of Defense
The Russian Ministry of Defense oversees the armed forces of the Russian Federation and provides official statements on military matters. According to this article, France’s deployment of 2,000 troops to Romania is reported as a major escalation. Russia frames NATO's actions as direct provocations that could justify countermeasures. Their communications are presented here as credible warnings of NATO expansionism.

4. Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFERL)
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is a U.S.-government-funded broadcaster aimed at providing news to countries where free press is limited or non-existent. The article references RFERL’s interviews on the Ukraine situation as part of the broader Western media narrative. It implies skepticism toward RFERL's neutrality given its funding and strategic role. RFERL’s role is contextualized as part of the broader information warfare surrounding Ukraine.

5. CIA (Central Intelligence Agency)
The CIA is the U.S. foreign intelligence service responsible for collecting, analyzing, and acting on national security information. In the article, the CIA is accused of manufacturing the "missile gap" during the Cold War to boost defense spending. It also allegedly recycled Cold War tactics to frame Trump and Putin as colluding figures in 2018. The CIA is portrayed as manipulating public fears to enrich the military-industrial complex.

6. Convair
Convair was a major American aircraft and missile manufacturer, best known for creating the Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile. It profited heavily from Cold War fears over a supposed Soviet missile advantage. IB Hale’s leadership at Convair connects the company to covert operations and political assassinations in the article’s narrative. Convair exemplifies the profit motives behind fabricated military crises.

7. General Atomics
General Atomics is a U.S. defense contractor specializing in drone technology and nuclear energy. The article suggests that companies like General Atomics benefit more from long-term incremental conflict than total nuclear war. By allowing adversaries limited access to technology, they drive perpetual defense spending. General Atomics is emblematic of the business model described in the "Rothschild Teeter Totter" theory.

In the latest escalation of the Russia-Ukraine NATO proxy war, President Macron of France has decided to send a contingent of 2,000 soldiers to Romania near the Ukrainian border. The Russian Ministry of Defense has made this claim since the 19th of March this year. Many NATO and DoD Generals have recommended this insertion of NATO troops to “unstick” the situation in Ukraine.

https://www.rferl.org/a/interview-us-colonel-crowther-nato-troops-ukraine/32855871.html

Of course, this raised the specter of invoking UN Charter Article Five for “collective defense”, stating that an attack against one NATO member’s force is an attack against all.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

France most recently has been accused of moving NATO forces into Ukraine, making the “French Escalation” the latest flashpoint in the Ukraine War to escalate into a wider conflict.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/france-already-preparing-some-2-000-troops-for-ukraine-russia-claims/3168788#

Several military analysts have chosen this tipping point of the conflict in Ukraine of directly involving NATO troops on the battlefield as the “no turning back” pathway to World War III.

Some military analysts and commenters, like former US weapons inspector in Iraq Scott Ritter, have said this will initiate automatic escalation to nuclear war. Mr. Ritter’s background as a WMD weapons investigator in Iraq gives him special qualifications to make such a claim. He has appeared with Judge Napolitano recently to emphasize this nuclear threat, and he has written a memorandum to the Biden Administration warning them of the dangers on the ground involvement of NATO troops in Ukraine.

I have a different take on the Ukraine situation from my trip to the Ukraine border near Lviv in 2020 and my subsequent trip to France in the summer of 2022, when I dealt directly with a Ukrainian arms buyer who was purchasing weapons for the Ukraine conflict. The Ukrainian weapons buyer I met in Cosne, France was purchasing intermediate-range missiles then in July of 2022, and he wanted to purchase even longer-range missiles for the Ukraine war from France.

I have a different take on the missile business and the missile war in Ukraine. I hypothesized the bankers actually want to finance both sides for their missiles in a gradually incremental form of missile warfare to maximize profits, not end the world with nuclear annihilation.

I introduced a concept in 2017 called the Rothschild Teeter Totter in which bankers that are financing both sides of the war choose to carefully and incrementally give each side a temporary tactical advantage, causing the other side to invest massive resources in regaining the small marginal advantage.

The best advantage of this strategy was demonstrated in the Cold War with what is known as the “missile gap.” A calculated amount of fear is heaped on one side of a conflict that they are “falling behind” in the Space Race or the Missile Race to spur entirely payouts of more national treasure to finance missile operations.

The CIA decided to create the public impression in the United States during the late 1950s and early 1960s that the Soviets were ahead of the US in the category of long-range missiles to stimulate more orders for the US defense industry. Movies like the 1962 Dr. Strangelove poked fun at the term “missile gap” with the prospect of nuclear annihilation with a “mine shaft gap” in popular culture. CIA even turned around this phrase from 1962 about CIA to hang it on both Trump and Putin in 2018.

https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/mineshaft-gap-lavish-bunkers-where-putin-trump-plan-fight-nuclear-war/

The CIA used the missile gap argument to oppose President Kennedy‘s initial overtures to reduce the number of long-range nuclear missiles. This strategy also turned out to be tremendously profitable for ICBM companies like Convair and General Atomics. Interestingly, the CEO of Convair, IB Hale, was a sniper for the FBI.

IB Hale had two sons, Robert Allen Hale, who, along with his brother, was also trained to be a sniper. This sniper family turns out to be incredibly important in the future path of the missile business in America from the JFK assassination on.

The JFK assassination gives us a clear demonstration that there are big dollars to be made in the aviation and missile business, and assassination is a viable option to protect that revenue stream.

Robert Allen Hale shot the daughter of Governor John Connolly of Texas in the back of the head with a shotgun, and was involved with compromise activities luring President Kennedy with a California woman named Judith Campbell.

My point is nuclear escalation makes no sense for the people making missiles. You basically fire off existing missile inventory with no additional sales, and you befoul the world with a nuclear contaminated wasteland.

It makes much more sense if you’re a company like General Atomics to actually give your last generation technology to the enemy for them to develop a credible threat that will spur the sales of your current technology. Now, interestingly enough, a man named Ken Hale, with a top-secret clearance of the US State department, has threatened to “Waco” and “Jonestown” my entire family because I talk about things like the “missile gap” being used today to stimulate missile sales.

I provide these numerous death threats in text messages to CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan who instead made up a story that I wished harm on an armed diplomatic security services officer reporting to the head of NATO.

Ken Hale was actually born in Dallas in 1960 around the time. Robert Allen Hale was siring his fifteen children in Dallas, so he is potentially the son of Robert Allen Hale and the grandson of IB Hale. Which makes the point that incremental missile sales is how you make money in the missile business taking advantage of a missile gap, not an all out strike. And the missile business is a blood sport.

But I went directly to France and stayed at the hotel of a Ukrainian missile buyer, and had breakfast with his bodyguards family and the bodyguard the next morning, and then breakfast with the Ukrainian missile buyer himself. Out of his own mouth, he said that he was purchasing intermediate range missiles, and was trying longer range missiles to be deployed to reach further into Russia to disturb supply chain for the Russian military machine. Here is the video I did on the topic in July 2020.

I see the deployments in Romania as exactly that step in the gradually escalating incremental missile war. That’s how you make money in the missile business, not from all out strikes. I think this is the Rothschild teeter totter tipping the missile tipping the balance once again to release huge amounts of fear on both sides of the missile conflict, not an actual legitimate threat of nuclear war.