Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vic Hughes's avatar

Good article, although there were several other Alinsky RFR rules involved also. It amazes me how few non-leftist radicals understand the true impact of Alinsky's book. I was talking to an "unenlightened" friend about the MSM being totally corrupt and they wanted to argue it. I asked them watch the news with a copy of Radical rules on hand and see how much fit Alinsky's techniques. He's come around and says he sees it everywhere now.

While there needs to be a reckoning, as long as Malone publicly supports no shots, does it mater now? We need all the support for that we can get, and he has a big following and gets press. From my perspective the Shot Wars have ended and we lost. Now all that matters is Stopping the WHO Global Tyranny. He appears to be publicly opposing that also. None of this relates to your lawsuit. Given the charges, you have a good shot (pun intend) at the Conspiracy Theorist Hall of Shame (Shame they weren't believed). I'm envious. (Were you on the Grassy Knoll too?)

Keep up the good work.

Expand full comment
Melanie Kimball's avatar

Sharyl Attkisson wrote about this through a different lens. (Wish I could remember who I "loaned" this book to!) There's no shortage of books about the ongoing & effective shenanigans duping dumbed-down, illiterate masses. Maybe few are ignorant to Frank Baum's fading & obscured allegory. How would you frame Malone's gambit for the Munchkin consumers?

https://www.c-span.org/video/?430881-2/after-words-sharyl-attkisson

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts